Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work, Employment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Total Quality Management: Anti-Union Trojan Horse or Management Albatross?

Darren McCabe

Department of Management Keele University STAFFORDSHIRE ST5 5BG

This article examines a co-operative union-management approach towards Total Quality Management (TQM) by recourse to a case study from the auto components manufacturing sector. Its purpose is twofold; first, it suggests that in contrast to much critical thinking, under certain conditions TQM need not undermine trade unions. Indeed, it is argued that a more moderate trade union stance towards TQM, in some circumstances, may prove to be a more effective form of resistance than a militant one. Second, the article provides insights into the ways in which TQM reinforces existing power relations, hierarchical structures, organisational bureaucracy and inequality, rather than transforming them as TQM pundits contend. The argument, however, is not that TQM simply enhances management control in a unilinear fashion. This is because it not only poses dangers for trade unions, but also presents management with dilemmas and contradictions. TQM is understood, therefore, to be part of the continuing and complex effort by management to balance control and consent within employment, the dynamics, and outcomes of which, are uncertain and need to be empirically examined.

Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 13, No. 4, 665-691 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/09500179922118178


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
E. L. Kick, J. C. Fraser, and B. L. Davis
Performance Management, Managerial Citizenship and Worker Commitment: A Study of the United States Postal Service with Some Global Implications
Economic and Industrial Democracy, February 1, 2006; 27(1): 137 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
D. McCabe
'Waiting for Dead Men's Shoes': Towards a Cultural Understanding of Management Innovation
Human Relations, May 1, 2002; 55(5): 505 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
C. Rees
Worker Responses to Quality Organisation: Discourse and Materiality in Organisational Change
Work Employment Society, December 1, 2001; 15(4): 743 - 761.
[Abstract] [PDF]