This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blair, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

`You're only as Good as Your Last Job': The Labour Process and Labour Market in the British Film Industry

University of Nottingham Business School

Recent debates surrounding the future of work and non-standard forms of employment have, especially in the United States, used the film industry as an exemplar and signifier of future industrial change. Much research conducted in the film industry implicitly or explicitly draws on the flexible specialisation framework to understand industrial organisation and labour market operation. It is the contention of this paper, however, that the dual labour market analysis associated with flexible specialisation explanations is too simplistic, failing to reflect the range of factors affecting labour market organisation and operation. The resulting static and atomised analysis is, as such, ill-equipped to conceptualise the complex patterns of organisation and movement evident in the highly uncertain context of film making. Furthermore, the operation and organisation of the labour market cannot be understood independently of the management of labour within the labour process. Production company management set the context and targets of work (in terms of work scheduling, pay, and conditions) and departmental heads retain method autonomy and control the recruitment and performance of `their' group members. However, this is the case within a context in which people need to continually resecure work and maintain positions within groups and contacts. Therefore, a seeming lack of control over tasks at the point of production is reinforced by the use of labour market mechanisms and influences their form.

Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 15, No. 1, 149-169 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/09500170122118814


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Townley, N. Beech, and A. McKinlay Managing in the creative industries: Managing the motley crew Human Relations, July 1, 2009; 62(7): 939 - 962. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Kelan Gender, risk and employment insecurity: The masculine breadwinner subtext Human Relations, September 1, 2008; 61(9): 1171 - 1202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Dickinson Accomplishing Journalism: Towards a Revived Sociology of a Media Occupation Cultural Sociology, July 1, 2007; 1(2): 189 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Roderick A very precarious profession:: Uncertainty in the working lives of professional footballers Work Employment Society, June 1, 2006; 20(2): 245 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Platman 'Portfolio Careers' and the Search for Flexibility in Later Life Work Employment Society, September 1, 2004; 18(3): 573 - 599. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Dean and C. Jones If Women Actors Were Working... Media Culture Society, July 1, 2003; 25(4): 527 - 541. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Baumann Informal Labour Market Governance: the Case of the British and German Media Production Industries Work Employment Society, March 1, 2002; 16(1): 27 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]