This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blackburn, R. M. Articles by Jarman, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Vertical Dimension of Occupational Segregation

University of Cambridge

Bradley Brooks

University of Cambridge

Jennifer Jarman

Dalhousie University

This article presents a new approach to measuring the most important dimension of gender segregation - the vertical dimension-in quantitative survey data. This, in turn, allows for a reassessment of the view that high levels of gender segregation are synonymous with high levels of social inequality. In order to do this, the article also draws upon significant conceptual developments. `Segregation' as it is commonly understood is named as `overall' segregation, and is the resultant of two components, `horizontal' and `vertical' segregation, representing difference and inequality separately. This provides a clear approach to measurement. The argument is developed with a case study of the British labour force. The pattern of segregation, in terms of its overall level and its components, varies considerably across sections of the labour force. In terms of inequality, the vertical components measured indicate that British women working full-time are more advantaged than we would expect, and that women working in part-time manual occupations, though facing the greatest relative disadvantage in terms of pay, are actually slightly advantaged over men working in manual occupations in terms of social stratification. Although overall segregation has remained relatively unchanged over the five year period from 1991 to 1996, there have been some significant changes to its components within the various sections of the employed British labour force in that time. By looking at the various sections of the labour force, relative to the labour force as a whole, we can achieve a better understanding of how segregation operates with respect to gender inequalities.

Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 15, No. 3, 511-538 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/09500170122119138


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Love, L. Dellve, M. Eklof, and M. Hagberg Inequalities in maintenance of health and performance between young adult women and men in higher education Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 19(2): 168 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Blackburn and J. Jarman Gendered Occupations: Exploring the Relationship between Gender Segregation and Inequality International Sociology, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 289 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Watts On the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Horizontal and Vertical Occupational Gender Segregation Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2005; 21(5): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Elliott Comparing occupational segregation in Great Britain and the United States: the benefits of using a multi-group measure of segregation Work Employment Society, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 153 - 174. [PDF]

				M. Charles Deciphering Sex Segregation: Vertical and Horizontal Inequalities in Ten National Labor Markets Acta Sociologica, December 1, 2003; 46(4): 267 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]