| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Non-Standard Work in Two Different Employment RegimesNorway and the United StatesInstitute for Research in Economics and Business Administration (SNF), Norway, karenm.olsen{at}snf.no
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA, Arne_Kalleberg{at}unc.edu This article examines organizations’ use of non-standard work arrangements - fixed-term employees hired directly by the organization, workers from temporary help agencies (THA), and contractors - in the United States and Norway. Our analysis is based on information obtained from surveys of 802 establishments in the US and 2130 in Norway. We find that Norwegian establishments make greater use of non-standard arrangements than the US establishments; we argue that this is due in part to the greater overall restrictive labour market regulations on hiring and firing regular workers, and greater demand for temporary labour resulting from generous access to leaves of absence, in Norway. We also find that certain institutional factors have a similar impact in both countries. First, establishments in the public sector are more likely to use direct-hired temporary workers and less apt to use contractors and THAs; this pattern is particularly striking in Norway, but is also evident in the United States. Second, highly unionized establishments tend to have the lowest use of non-standard arrangements in both countries.
Key Words: comparative research • employment • labour law • labour markets • non-standard work • organizations • temporary work • unionization
Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 18, No. 2,
321-348 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
