This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Simpson, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Masculinity at Work

The Experiences of Men in Female Dominated Occupations

Brunel University, UK, ruth.simpson{at}brunel.ac.uk

This article presents the findings of a research project on the implications of men’s non-traditional career choices for their experiences within the organization and for gender identity. The research is based on 40 in-depth interviews with male workers from four occupational groups: librarians, cabin crew, nurses and primary school teachers. Results suggest a typology of male workers in female dominated occupations: seekers (who actively seek the career), finders (who find the occupation in the process of making general career decisions) and settlers (who settle into the career after periods of time in mainly male dominated occupations). Men benefit from their minority status through assumptions of enhanced leadership (the assumed authority effect), by being given differential treatment (the special consideration effect) and being associated with a more careerist attitude to work (the career effect). At the same time, they feel comfortable working with women (the zone of comfort effect). Despite this comfort, men adopt a variety of strategies to re-establish a masculinity that has been undermined by the ‘feminine‘ nature of their work. These include re-labelling, status enhancement and distancing from the feminine. The dynamics of maintaining and reproducing masculinities within the non-traditional work setting are discussed in the light of recent theorizing around gender, masculinity and work.

Key Words: gender • masculinity • non-traditional occupations • post-structuralism

Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 349-368 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/09500172004042773


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Pullen and R. Simpson Managing difference in feminized work: Men, otherness and social practice Human Relations, April 1, 2009; 62(4): 561 - 587. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Dex, K. Ward, and H. Joshi Gender differences in occupational wage mobility in the 1958 cohort Work Employment Society, June 1, 2008; 22(2): 263 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Watts Porn, pride and pessimism: experiences of women working in professional construction roles Work Employment Society, June 1, 2007; 21(2): 299 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Bauder Origin, employment status and attitudes towards work: immigrants in Vancouver, Canada Work Employment Society, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 709 - 729. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Rolfe Where are the Men? Gender Segregation in the Childcare and Early Years Sector National Institute Economic Review, January 1, 2006; 195(1): 103 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Simpson and P. Lewis An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: Re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility Human Relations, October 1, 2005; 58(10): 1253 - 1275. [Abstract] [PDF]