Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work, Employment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Procter, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Forrester, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Flexibility, Politics & Strategy: In Defence of the Model of the Flexible Firm

Stephen J. Procter

Department of Management at Keele University

Michael Rowlinson

School of Management and Finance at the University of Nottingham

Louise McArdle,

Department of Organisation at the University of Central Lancashire

John Hassard

Department of Management at Keele University

Paul Forrester

Department of Management at Keele University

This paper offers a defence of Atkinson's model of the flexible firm. It takes issue with two arguments against it: that the model needs to be understood at a political level, as part of a wider `post-industrial' vision; and that the observed increase in flexibility offers the model no support because of its `non-strategic' nature. On the first of these it is argued that flexibility operates on a different level from flexible specialisation and other varieties of `post-industrialism' and that to consider them together confuses rather than illuminates the debate. On the second, it is argued that the criticism relies on an unnecessarily restrictive view of strategy. Rather than being regarded as `plans', strategies should be regarded as `patterns' in decision-making. On the basis of this alternative conception the paper suggests ways in which the flexible firm model might be recast.

Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 8, No. 2, 221-242 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/095001709482004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
A. L. Kalleberg
Flexible Firms and Labor Market Segmentation: Effects of Workplace Restructuring on Jobs and Workers
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2003; 30(2): 154 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
G. Ursell
Labour flexibility in the UK commercial television sector
Media Culture Society, January 1, 1998; 20(1): 129 - 153.
[Abstract]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
I. McIntosh and J. Broderick
`Neither One Thing Nor the Other': Compulsory Competitive Tendering and Southburgh Cleansing Services
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1996; 10(3): 413 - 430.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
H. Hamblin
Employees' Perspectives on One Dimension of Labour Flexibility: Working at a Distance
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1995; 9(3): 473 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
P. Brown
Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion: Some Observations on Recent Trends in Education, Employment and the Labour Market
Work Employment Society, March 1, 1995; 9(1): 29 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]