This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoque, K. Articles by Noon, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Equal Opportunities Policy and Practice in Britain:

Evaluating the ‘Empty Shell’ Hypothesis

Nottingham University Business School, UKkim.hoque{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Mike Noon

De Montfort University, UKmnoon{at}dmu.ac.uk

This article evaluates the nature and incidence of equal opportunities (EO) policies in the UK using data from the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey (WERS 98).The article identifies the types of workplaces that are more likely to adopt formal gender, ethnicity, disability and age policies. It then assesses whether the policies are ‘substantive’ or merely ‘empty shells’: first, by evaluating the extent to which workplaces that have adopted EO policies have also adopted supporting EO practices; and second, by evaluating the proportion of employees who have access to EO practices in workplaces where they have been adopted. On balance, the ‘empty shell’ argument is more convincing. Smaller workplaces, private sector workplaces and workplaces without an HR or personnel specialist are identified as being more likely to have an ‘empty shell’ policy.While unionized workplaces are more likely to have a formal policy, those policies are no less likely to constitute ‘empty shells’. Finally, the policy, economic and legal implications of the findings are discussed.

Key Words: age • disability • equal opportunities • ethnicity • gender

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Foster Legal obligation or personal lottery?: Employee experiences of disability and the negotiation of adjustments in the public sector workplace Work Employment Society, March 1, 2007; 21(1): 67 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Heery and H. Conley Frame Extension in a Mature Social Movement: British Trade Unions and Part-time Work, 1967-2002 Journal of Industrial Relations, February 1, 2007; 49(1): 5 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]