Work, Employment & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollert, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 2, No. 3, 281-316 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0950017088002003002

The `Flexible Firm': Fixation or Fact?

Anna Pollert

Industrial Relations Research Unit University of Warwick COVENTRY CV4 7AL

The model of the `flexible firm' has gained a prominent role in shaping debate about labour market flexibility and employment restructuring in the 1980s. It argues that employers are increasingly segmenting their workers between a permanent `core' of full-time employees, and a `periphery' of part-time, temporary, subcontract and `outsourced' workers. The `core' provides `functional flexibility' through lowered job demarcations and multi-skilling, while the `periphery' provides `numerical flexibility'. This paper argues that these generalisations are based on very selective cases, and reviews evidence which shows that restructuring follows far more complex and uneven lines than this polarisation, which if anything is better reflected in the public sector, which the model omits. The `flexible firm' conflates employment developments due to sectoral restructuring, with `new' `manpower policies', masking the importance of continuities and qualitative changes within these. While registering the increasing vulnerability of many workers, the model fails to note that for many, this is not `new', nor that the dynamic of the eighties is attacking the strength of all workers, including the so-called `core'. Conceptually, the notion of `core' and `periphery' is confused, circular and value laden. The model is criticised for blurring description, prediction and prescription in an ambiguous futurology which slips between research reportage and `best practice' policy. Even here it is ambiguous, and dubious from management's own point of view. Finally, its concern with labour market flexibility is set within the current international climate of neo-classical revival, and the model's institutional interface between Government labour market polices and `leading edge' firms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
S. Glosser and L. Golden
Is labour becoming more or less flexible? Changing dynamic behaviour and asymmetries of labour input in US manufacturing
Camb. J. Econ., July 1, 2005; 29(4): 535 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
L. Byoung-Hoon and S. J. Frenkel
Divided Workers: Social relations between contract and regular workers in a Korean auto company
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2004; 18(3): 507 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
P. McGovern, D. Smeaton, and S. Hill
Bad Jobs in Britain: Nonstandard Employment and Job Quality
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2004; 31(2): 225 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
A. L. Kalleberg
Flexible Firms and Labor Market Segmentation: Effects of Workplace Restructuring on Jobs and Workers
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2003; 30(2): 154 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
J. Hassard
Essai: Organizational Time: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Reflections
Organization Studies, November 1, 2002; 23(6): 885 - 892.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
C. Allan, M. O'Donnell, and D. Peetz
More Tasks, Less Secure, Working Harder: Three Dimensions of Labour Utilisation
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1999; 41(4): 519 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
K. O'Reilly and D. Rose
Changing Employment Relations: Plus ca Change, Plus C'est La Meme Chose? Reflections Arising from the ESRC Review of Government Social Classifications
Work Employment Society, December 1, 1998; 12(4): 713 - 733.
[PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
J. Curran, M. Wood, S. Marlow, M. Hart, R. Jarvis, S. Brodie, and R. Leigh
Abstracts and Commentaries
International Small Business Journal, April 1, 1998; 16(3): 102 - 119.
[PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
C. T. Husbands
Job Flexibility and Variations in the Performances and Motivations of Longer-Term Part-Time Teaching Auxiliaries at the London School of Economics and Political Science
Work Employment Society, March 1, 1998; 12(1): 121 - 144.
[PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
T. P. Boje
Gender, Work Time and Flexible Employment: The Case of Denmark
Time Society, October 1, 1996; 5(3): 341 - 361.
[Abstract]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
I. McIntosh and J. Broderick
`Neither One Thing Nor the Other': Compulsory Competitive Tendering and Southburgh Cleansing Services
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1996; 10(3): 413 - 430.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
M. Bresnen
An Organizational Perspective on Changing Buyer-Supplier Relations: A Critical Review of the Evidence
Organization, February 1, 1996; 3(1): 121 - 146.
[Abstract]


Home page
European Journal of Industrial RelationsHome page
S. Jefferys
European Industrial Relations and Welfare States
European Journal of Industrial Relations, November 1, 1995; 1(3): 317 - 340.
[Abstract]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
S. J. Procter, M. Rowlinson, L. McArdle,, J. Hassard, and P. Forrester
Flexibility, Politics & Strategy: In Defence of the Model of the Flexible Firm
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1994; 8(2): 221 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. O. Davidson
What do Franchisors do? Control and Commercialisation in Milk Distribution
Work Employment Society, March 1, 1994; 8(1): 23 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
S. J. Deery and A. Mahony
Temporal Flexibility: Management Strategies and Employee Preferences in the Retail Industry
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1994; 36(3): 332 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
G. Anderson, P. Brosnan, and P. Walsh
Flexibility, Casualization and Externalization in the New Zealand workforce
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1994; 36(4): 491 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Payne and C. Payne
Unemployment and Peripheral Work
Work Employment Society, December 1, 1993; 7(4): 513 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
M. Kelleher, P. Scott, and B. Jones
Resistant to Change? Some Unexplained Omissions in the 1990 Standard Occupational Classification
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1993; 7(3): 437 - 449.
[PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
J. Buchanan and R. Callus
Efficiency and Equity at Work: The Need for Labour Market Regulation in Australia
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1993; 35(4): 515 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Pulkingham
Employment Restructuring in the Health Service: Efficiency Initiatives, Working Patterns and Workforce Composition
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1992; 6(3): 397 - 421.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. F. Geary
Employment Flexibility and Human Resource Management: The Case of Three American Electronics Plants
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1992; 6(2): 251 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
C. Mason, S. Pinch, and A. Storey
Self-Employment in a British City: An Analysis of Household Survey Data
International Small Business Journal, October 1, 1991; 10(1): 27 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
R. Blom, M. Kivinen, H. Melin, and E. Rannik
THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM AND THE WORK SITUATION: A COMPARISON OF FINLAND AND ESTONIA
International Sociology, September 1, 1991; 6(3): 343 - 360.
[Abstract]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
S. Hill
How do you Manage a Flexible Firm? The Total Quality Model
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1991; 5(3): 397 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
A. Pendleton
The Barriers to Flexibility: Flexible Rostering on the Railways
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1991; 5(2): 241 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
A. Felstead
The Social Organization of the Franchise: A Case of `Controlled Self-Employment'
Work Employment Society, March 1, 1991; 5(1): 37 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
G. J. Bamber
Flexible Work Organisation: Inferences from Britain and Australia
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, August 1, 1990; 28(3): 28 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
C. Hakim
Core and Periphery in Employers' Workforce Strategies: Evidence from the 1987 E.L.U.S. Survey
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1990; 4(2): 157 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
I. McLoughlin
Management, Work Organisation and Cad - Towards Flexible Automation?
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1990; 4(2): 217 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
R. Brown and L. Morris
A Decade of Change?
Work Employment Society, May 1, 1990; 4(5): 1 - 7.
[PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Lovering
A Perfunctory Sort of Post-Fordism: Economic Restructuring and Labour Market Segmentation in Britain in the 1980s
Work Employment Society, May 1, 1990; 4(5): 9 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Kelly
British Trade Unionism 1979-89: Change, Continuity and Contradictions
Work Employment Society, May 1, 1990; 4(5): 29 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
D. Marsden and M. Thompson
Flexibility Agreements and their Significance in the Increase in Productivity in British Manufacturing Since 1980
Work Employment Society, March 1, 1990; 4(1): 83 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
J. Natti
Flexibility, Segmentation and Use of Labour in Finnish Retail Trade
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1990; 33(4): 373 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
I. Dey
Flexible `Parts' and Rigid `Fulls': The Limited Revolution in Work-Time Patterns
Work Employment Society, December 1, 1989; 3(4): 465 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
C. Lane
From `Welfare Capitalism' to `Market Capitalism'; A Comparative Review of Trends towards Employment Flexibility in the Labour Markets of Three Major European Societies
Sociology, November 1, 1989; 23(4): 583 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]